Press release: Greening Freight Transport: protectionism or rebalancing? 03/10/23
< Retour à la listeYou can download the press release as a pdf at the bottom of this page
Greening Freight Transport: protectionism or rebalancing?
UIRR, the industry association of European Combined Transport, examined the European Commission’s Greening Freight Transport Package (GFTP) proposals and wonders of the underlying motivation: does the Commission propose to protect the 76% market share of road transport, or is there an intention to rebalance the modal equilibrium in Europe? The answer is difficult to give as the amendment proposal of the Combined Transport Directive is yet to be published. But based on the 3 known proposals, the package appears to be leaning towards protectionism, and not rebalancing. UIRR sees a path that could make the Package more equitable, but this will require European co-legislators to first come clean with regards to their intentions. Only then can the necessary amendment be evaluated and inserted into the proposals. This is reflected in the GFTP position paper[1] published by UIRR today. In its first proposal-specific position paper UIRR examines the Commission’s proposed amendment of the Weights and Dimensions Directive[2] in detail. The proposed amendments will not deliver the declared objectives of enhancing (carbon- and energy-) efficiency of road haulage, and promoting intermodal freight transport, therefore the proposal should ideally be rejected and returned to the Commission. Should the call for rejection not be followed, the minimum is to keep together the 3 components of the Greening Freight Transport Package impacting road haulage[3] to compensate for some of the worst excesses[4]. The most important points from an intermodal perspective are:
The amendment creates the legal framework for the cross-border circulation of 44-tonne gross weight gigaliners, which would cement the present market position of trucks on the dominant long-distance low-density palletised cargo segment, preventing any modal shift away from road. All this at a time when door-to-door Combined Transport offers a multiple times favourable performance in every metric when compared to trucks. In the worst case even existing Combined Transport carriage of such assignments will revert back to road. Insufficient and inadequate intermodal transport promotion measures, such as additional weight, additional height, gigaliners for road legs or 4 tonnes of additional batteries for electric trucks performing Combined Transport road legs are unnecessary and useless. The intermodal sector needs stability of weights and dimensions to boost investment confidence. In the United States of America the comparable weights and dimensions legislation has not been changed since 1984[5]. -------------------------------- [3] The new CountEmissionEU Regulation and the Weights and Dimensions and Combined Transport Directive amendments |
“Door-to-door Combined Transport is the effective, affordable and low-risk solution to achieve the EU’s policy objectives. The Greening Freight Transport Package should reflect this and adopt changes for the affordable and effective solution, not the far second best.” – cautioned UIRR President Ralf-Charley Schultze. |
- Documents correspondants
UIRR PR GFTP & WDD amendment | EN |